Courts and Court Marriage Witnesses:
For the online marriage procedure in Pakistan or the court marriage witnesses, the court requires two witnesses. It obtained permission/sanction from Guardian Court, and restraint incorporated in Guardianship Certificate was not applied to a mortgage under reference in the wake of sanction/permission in writing by Guardian Court for the online marriage procedure in Pakistan or the court marriage witnesses.
Defendants ever did not object to an order issued by Guardian Court, and it executed mortgage deed regarding property in question after an order issued by Guardian Court. The creation of mortgage charges was legal and was enforceable against defendants in terms of judgment and decree passed by the Banking Court. High Court declined to interfere as it pointed out no illegality or defect in the judgment passed by Banking Court. The appeal was dismissed in the circumstances.” Comments Appointment of guardian of the insane minor.
Jurisdiction of Court:
Application for Jurisdiction of Court. Permanent residence of an insane minor girl was at Place K’ and Father of such child who had made a gift in her favor at Place K and had died there. Therefore, District Court at Place K and not at place’ L,’ held, would have jurisdiction to entertain and decide the online marriage procedure in Pakistan or the court marriage witnesses. The mother of three minors applied to appoint her guardian of person and property of children, which application was accepted. She was appointed guardian of minors as prayed for by her, and a guardian certificate was issued to her. Mother, on the strength of said guardianship certificate, sought leave of the Court to sell the property belonging to the minors to incur their expenditure for their betterment. Still, the Court refused to grant such leave, and the petition in that respect was dismissed.
Online Marriage procedure:
Subsequently, Guardian Judge taking suo motu action, declared the online marriage procedure in Pakistan or the court marriage witnesses issued to the mother as canceled; however, on appeal against the said order of the Guardian Judge, Appellate Court set aside impugned judgment of the. It restored the guardian Judge and guardianship certificate. The father’s minors and the minors filed a revision petition against the decision of the Guardian Judge whereby the mother was allowed to sell the property of the children.
In the application filed by the mother for appointing her as guardian of person and property of minors, public-at-large and petitioner was a party served through proclamation in the newspaper for the online marriage procedure in Pakistan or the court marriage witnesses. It placed it ex parte, which ex parte proceedings had never been challenged by the petitioners. Such was purely a case under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, to which the provisions of C.P.C. were applicable given S.48 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. The revision petition before the High Court, in circumstances, was competent; however, on merits for the online marriage procedure in Pakistan or the court marriage witnesses, the petitioners had no case because the mother was duly appointed as guardian of person and property of the minors and permission to sell the property in question was obtained.